Charlotte J. Haug, M.D Red blood cells ., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher also owned by Springer, retracted 43 content articles for the same reason. How is it possible to fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plants, had set up a straightforward procedure. He gave journals tips for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, providing them with names and e-mail addresses. But these addresses had been ones he created, therefore the requests to review went right to him or his co-workers. The fallout from Moon’s confession: 28 content in various journals released by Informa had been retracted, and one editor resigned.
These images are then used to make a series of one-millimeter thick slices that can be seen as a 3D reconstruction of the breast. Women see little difference between a typical 2D mammogram and a 3D mammogram. The exam requires a few seconds longer and the positioning is the same just. The real difference is in the given information open to the doctor. Related StoriesNew review article discusses benefits, limitations of current screening mammography practicesAdjunctive ultrasonography enhances breasts cancer detectionWomen who visit higher volume mammography services more likely to benefit from screeningThe technology provides radiologists the capability to recognize and characterize specific breast structures and obviously see features which might be obscured in a normal 2D mammogram by overlapping regular breast anatomy that may mimic or mask a tumor.